Athletic Performance Toolbox

Multi-Sport Athletes: In Season Program

by

This article was provided by  Coaches Network

By Fred Eaves

Over the past decade, many high school athletes have chosen to play just one sport. By focusing on one activity year-round, they believe it will help them excel in that one sport. And there are more and more opportunities to participate in almost every sport during the off-season.

But most recently, many coaches are speaking out against that trend. We’ve come to realize that sport-specificity often hinders an athlete from fully developing and can lead to more injuries. It also limits student-athletes’ opportunities for learning and being exposed to different situations.

In response, many sport and strength coaches are encouraging students to become multi-sport athletes. Like a generation ago, we want to see our football quarterback on the mound in the spring, our soccer forward sprinting on the track team, and our middle hitter in volleyball grabbing rebounds on the basketball court.

But how does this affect their work in the weightroom? If they are playing on the high school lacrosse team while also suiting up for a club soccer squad in the spring, will a strenuous lifting program wear them out?

Here at Battle Ground Academy, in Franklin, Tenn., we encourage all our athletes to go multi-sport. We also ask them to participate in our strength and conditioning program. Here’s how I make sure those two things do not hinder each other:

Talk it through: When training a multi-sport athlete, the main concern is to figure out the demands on the particular athlete—both the demands of the sport they’re currently in and any stressors outside of it. Today’s generation of kids are running from school, to practice, to training sessions, so it’s really important to gauge all the athlete is involved in.

Therefore, my initial step is to talk to the athlete and ask him or her to tell me all that they’re doing. For example, I’ve had instances where kids who are in football season are playing baseball on the weekends, and that will change my approach to training them. Before I devise any lifting plans, I make sure I completely understand the scope of all the different stresses that the multi-sport athlete is under.

Reduce the Workload: After communicating with the athlete and learning what they’re involved in, I come up with a plan to modify their in-season training. The main alteration is usually a reduction of their training. This entails volume reduction, either by sets or reps, and lowering the intensity. We still ask the athlete to work hard and do some heavy lifting, but we’re smart about how we do that by maintaining low volume.

I may also alter specific exercises a bit depending on the sport and position. For example, when training a catcher, I might limit the depth of a squat to reduce stress on the knees.

Train Opposites: Another thing to consider doing with in-season athletes is training opposites. For example, if they do a lot of rotation in their sport, I may plan anti-rotation exercises. We’re not going to take a baseball player who’s rotating all the time as a pitcher and do a bunch of medicine ball rotation throws with him—we’re going to do the opposite. And we do the same thing with movement training. If we have a soccer player who’s doing a ton of changing direction during his season, then we may have her do linear sprint mechanics.

Simplify: It can also help to simplify the exercises for multi-sport athletes. If they are going back and forth between two different sports, their brain and muscle memory have a lot to take in. I might adjust a lift for them so it is very straightforward and does not require learning anything new. At the same time, it’s important that the athlete is working alongside his or her teammates and part of the group.

Encourage them: Playing multiple sports is hard to accomplish successfully. So I make sure I cheer on our athletes who do both. I encourage them when they seem overwhelmed and I let them know their success is important to me.

I also make sure to tell them all the benefits. A big one is injury reduction. In my time at BGA, I can’t recall a three-sport athlete who’s had a catastrophic injury. Kids are going to get bumps and bruises, but when we have an athlete who tears an ACL, 90 percent of the time it’s a one-sport athlete because they’re doing the same activity year round.

Kids who play multiple sports are also likely to be more holistic athletes. They learn how to be better teammates and they fuel that competitive fire year round. Also, all coaching staffs are different and have something to offer. A young person learns by being exposed to different teaching methods.

 

Fred Eaves, EdS, MEd, CSCS, RSCC, IYCA, USAW, USATF, BIOFORCE Conditioning Coach Certified, is Director of Wellness and Athletic Performance at Battle Ground Academy in Franklin, Tenn. He was honored in 2015 by the National Strength and Conditioning Association as its High School Strength and Conditioning Coach of the Year and in 2013 as the Samson Equipment and American Football Monthly Central Region High School Strength and Conditioning Coach of the Year.

Tendon Adaptations

by

Chris Beardsley  graduated from Durham University with a Masters Degree in 2001. He since contributed to the fields of sports science and sports medicine by working alongside researchers from Team GB boxing, the School of Sport and Recreation at Auckland University of Technology, the Faculty of Sport at the University of Ljubljana, the Department of Sport at Staffordshire University, and the College of Health Solutions at Arizona State University. He is also a Director at Strength and Conditioning Research Limited 

For more great information regarding strength and conditioning follow Chris on Twitter and Instagram

Tendons tend to get most attention when they are injured.

This is unfortunate, as tendon stiffness is likely a key factor that determines rate of force development (RFD), which is a key component of explosive strength.

In other words, it is not just physical therapists who need to know about tendons. Strength coaches will also benefit from giving tendons some thought!

In rehabilitation programs, eccentric loading is popular for producing tendon adaptations. However, contraction type is not actually very important for producing increases in tendon stiffness.

On the other hand, the load does have an effect.

Heavier loads produce greater changes.

Load is not the only factor that is important for producing tendon adaptations.

Indeed, plyometrics can involve quite large loads (especially if high boxes are used for drop jumps), and plyometrics are often used to promote “stiffness” and “energy storage” in athletes.

But while plyometrics are a great training method, they probably don’t achieve their beneficial effects by producing substantial increases in tendon stiffness.

Short duration, repeated loading types like plyometrics are not able to increase tendon stiffness by very much. On the other hand, heavy loads corresponding to around 3 seconds of time under tension are optimal.

Taking these studies together, it seems likely that conventional, heavy strength training is optimal for producing tendon adaptions, including increased tendon stiffness.

And as we saw recently, increased tendon stiffness will likely then enhance rate of force development.

On the other hand, lighter loads, ballistic strength training, and plyometrics are unlikely to achieve the same results, although they are probably essential for increasing maximum contraction velocities.

Summer Conditioning: Mid Summer Check-in

by

This article was provided by Training and Conditioning

By Patrick McHenry

Patrick McHenry, CSCS*D, is the Director of Strength & Conditioning at Castle View (Colo.) High School. He has presented to sport coaches, strength coaches, and physical education teachers at state, national, and international conferences. He is the former Colorado state director for the NSCA, was the chairman for the NSCA High School Special Interest Group, and is currently on the NSCA Board of Directors and Coaching Performance Committee.

In the last article, we looked at building your summer strength and conditioning program. Now we are about halfway finished with the summer and it is time to assess where your athletes’ current training status is, where you want your athletes to be, how are you going to evaluate their current training status at the end of the summer, and where you want them to be before the season starts.

In this new meso-cycle four-week program, it should be designed to maximize power for volleyball, football, and those sports that require power; work on power / metabolic training for soccer; and building endurance for the cross country team. The goal of a periodized program is to develop strength the athlete can use. To accomplish this, the coach needs to change the sets, repetitions, and exercises to maximize the athletes’ time in the weight room.

To increase an athlete’s power, the coach needs to design a program that “increases the rate of force development” or “how fast they can move”. Lifting heavy weights slow will not transfer to a fast powerful athlete. In fact, it can even make the athlete slower and will interfere with the athletes’ performance.

Research shows that to develop multi-effort power (i.e., 3 to 5 repetitions) the athlete should use 75-85% of their one repetition maximum for 3-5 sets of 3-5 repetitions (1). The athlete is working on speed-strength, which means the bar is moving fast, about 1 – 1.3 m/s or roughly 1 repetition per second in a bench or 1 repetition per 1.3 sec in a squat. Dr. Bryan Mann (2) has written about velocity based training in this blog. Remember, your athlete will not have a one time all out maximum effort during a play. Most of the time it will be two or three hits, pushes, or jumps during the play so our training needs to utilize the same energy system and speed strength patterns.

The lifting program is set. Next, the coach will want to look at the athlete’s conditioning level. By developing a conditioning program, the coach will ensure that athlete the is not over-trained or undertrained, yet will be able to meet the demands of the sport.

It is important to know which energy system is being utilized during the game play. An average play in American high school football lasts from 5 to 7 seconds with about 40 seconds of rest between them. Why have athletes running for 40 and 50 yard sprints when the play does not last that long? In volleyball the average rally last about 4-6 seconds with about 11 to 16 seconds rest. In soccer there is a change of play about every 5-6 seconds. This means that the coach wants to train the first two energy systems or the APT- PT and the Lactic Acid system which runs for approximately .6 seconds to 2 minutes.

To work the ATP- PC system or the Lactic Acid system the coach will write out how far to run for and how long the athlete needs to rest. The work to rest ratio is critical. Some coaches feel that if the athlete is not continuously moving it is a waste of time and practice. This is far from the truth. The rest period is critical for development. The body grows when it is sleeping and recovery can help relieve the stress.

Here is an example of work to rest progression for different sports:

 

FOOTBALL conditioning

WEEKS 1-2: 30 yards 4×4:30 seconds between reps, 1:10 between sets

(run 30 yds, rest :30 run 30yds, rest ; 30, run 30yds, rest :30, run 30yds REST 1:10 Repeat for 3 more times)

WEEKS 3-4: 20 yards 4×4:30 seconds between reps, 1:00 between sets

(run 20 yds, rest :30 run 20yds, rest ; 30, run 20yds, rest :30, run 20yds REST 1:10 Repeat for 3 more times)

WEEKS 5: 15 yards 4×4:25 seconds between reps, 1:00 between sets

(Repeat for 3 more times)

 

SOCCER conditioning

3 laps around track run straights jog the curve

5 laps around track run straights jog the curve

7 laps around track run straights jog the curve

 

VOLLEYBALL / GIRLS BB / SOFTBALL conditioning:

shuffle 10 yds x 5 then run up and backpedal 10 yards 5 times

 

1) Essentials of Strength and Conditioning second edition p414

2) Bryan Mann Talks Velocity Based Training https://www.elitefts.com/news/bryan-mann-talks-velocity-based-training/

Monitoring Athletes

by

This article was provided by Training and Conditioning

By: Ryan Curtis MS, ATC, CSCS, Associate Director of Athlete Performance and Safety, Korey Stringer Institute

Athlete monitoring is becoming standard practice for maximizing player performance,reducing injury risk, and optimizing competition readiness. For high-performance programs, monitoring load-performance and load-injury relationships are essential for providing insight into how athletes are responding to stresses incurred during and outside of training and competition. Ultimately, how an athlete performs is impacted by the accumulation of stress and the efficacy of training. Therefore, it is important to evaluate stress imposed during training and match sessions, as well as, the strain incurred by each athlete. Understanding the difference between stressors (i.e., intense exercise, heat, cold, altitude, etc) and the strain (body’s response to stress) experienced by a biological system (i.e., human body) is essential to monitoring and manipulating parameters important for athlete preparation. Other benefits to monitoring athletes beyond determining training efficacy, such as gathering scientific explanations for changes in performance or injury risk, enhancing coach and practitioner confidence when manipulating training loads, and boosting athlete-coach- practitioner relationships all contribute to the efficacy and buy-in of monitoring practices. There are four main purposes for monitoring athletes; optimizing readiness, ensuring proper prescription of stress and recovery (periodization), reducing injury risk, and monitoring safe and effective return to play programs (Figure 1). While each of these purposes are important, emphasis and priority placed on these purposes will vary based on team’s load monitoring philosophy.

 

Monitoring Training and Competition Load

When monitoring the dosage of stress imposed during training or competition, practitioners and scientists typically refer to training load. Load is simply the product of duration and intensity of activity. Training load can be further described as either external (work imposed independent of internal strain) or internal (response of the body to external load), as shown in Figure 2. The association between external and internal load can give great insight into the status of the athlete (i.e., fresh vs. fatigued). With advancements in wearable technology, monitoring of athletes’ external load has received a great deal of attention. Specifically, global positioning systems (GPS) capabilities have allowed ease of monitoring parameters such as distance, time, and efforts in multiple velocity zones (0-7.2 km/h-walk, 7.2-14.4 km/h-jog, 14.4-21.6 km/h-run, >21.6 km/h-sprint) used for tracking running performance. GPS-enabled devices use positional differentiation to calculate distance and acceleration.

Beyond quantifying the intensity distribution of session types (i.e., match, training, conditioning, etc.), GPS metrics are often reported as aggregate measures such as high-intensity running distance (distance >14.4 km/h), number of sprints (efforts > 25.2 km/h), and average speed (meters per minute). However, GPS technology is limited in its ability to detect external movement beyond positional change and additionally, has serious limitations with tracking movement indoors. This leaves monitoring of indoor team sports such as basketball and volleyball at a disadvantage. However, modern player tracking technology typically uses integrated inertial sensors such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers to help quantify stress imposed in all three planes. Calculated metrics such as PlayerLoad TM (Catapult) from integrated inertial sensors have a strong relationship with running performance measures such as total distance covered, while additionally estimating general load on the body and therefore stress from actions such as tackling, accelerations, decelerations, changes of direction and collisions. Due to the inertial movement sensors ability to detect magnitude of movement (i.e., g-forces) in 3 planes of motion, a single arbitrary unit of load might give a more accurate display of total stresses incurred during activity.

Both physiological and psychological measures such as heart rate, lactate, muscle oxygen, and rating of perceived exertion (RPE) can be used to monitor loads sustained internally. Of the numerous methods of objectively quantifying internal load, heart rate derivatives such as time in heart rate zones, expressed as percent of maximum heart rate, and weighted scores such as training impulse (TRIMP) are most commonly used. These measures allow categorization of training stress into relative zones such as high, moderate, and low. Of the methods to quantify internal load by subjective means, using RPE and session RPE (sRPE) are by far the most common. sRPE is simply the product of session duration and the athlete-reported RPE post-training/competition. This subjective measure has shown good association with external running performance measures.

 

Monitoring Readiness, Recovery and Wellness

Monitoring readiness, recovery, and wellness requires both physiological and psychological assessment in order to gain understanding of an athlete’s true state. These assessments could be as simple as asking the athlete “how do you feel?” or as complex as using microtechnology (telemetry or photoplesthsmography) to ascertain the variability in heart beat to beat intervals during rest or sleep. Monitoring the response to training and/or competition gives the practitioner great insight into individual dose-response relationships and helps to promote precision with recovery practices. For example, if an athlete is excessively fatigued, coaches may prescribe a recovery session or reduce training load for that day. Current practices in monitoring athlete readiness prior to activity include heart rate-based autonomic nervous system assessment (i.e., heart rate variability, HRV; heart rate recovery, HRR), neuromuscular function tests (i.e., counter movement jump, CMJ; reaction tests), and wellness questionnaires/assessments (i.e., stress, fatigue, soreness, anxiety). More extensive monitoring such as biochemical/immunological/hormonal assessment (i.e., blood, saliva, and urine-biomarkers) and psychological inventories (i.e., Profile of Mood States, Sport Anxiety Scale, Rest and Recovery Questionnaire) can give insight into overtraining or maladaptation if assessed longitudinally.

Limitations in Athlete Monitoring

While there is much to gain from monitoring athletes, there are several limitations that must be considered when implementing a monitoring program. Monitoring athletes does not always require large funding sources (i.e. subjective markers of training load combined with wellness reporting), however analyzing data does require time, manpower, and experience/skill. With vast amounts of data pouring in from sometimes multiple technologies and questionnaires, persons experienced in data management and analysis are often needed derive meaning and interpretation beyond simple descriptive reporting. In addition, attaining buy-in from athletes and coaching staff is sometimes difficult if immediate returns are not seen. Regarding technological limitations, very little validation and reliability testing is conducted by parties outside of the technology manufacturer. With that, the way in which raw data is processed and filtered varies by manufacturer and software version. Because software updates can occur quite often and the way in which data is filtered and reported is changed, validity and reliability of the device will change concurrently. This has severe implications when determining the precision and consistency of measurement longitudinally.

Taken together, programs must weigh the benefits and limitations of athlete monitoring together. Without structure in data management, plans for implementation based on data analysis, and athlete-coach buy-in, monitoring athletes can be a waste of time and resources that could be used to gain advantage elsewhere. However, if care is taken in promoting, structuring, and implementing a purposeful and practical monitoring program, teams stand to gain a great advantage in maximizing the health and performance of their athletes.

Plyometrics Exercises with Med Balls

by

Plyometric drills are very good for power transfer and teach the body to use the stretch-shortening cycle. Plyometric drills good because they allow the body to mimic what occurs during a vertical jump in sport.

In the video clip below Preston Greene, Strength and Conditioning coach for the Florida Gator Mens Basketball Team, demonstrates 4 plyometric drills that utilize a med ball.  These drill are from a complete dvd dedicated to improving an athletes vertical jump. For more information about that dvd click the link AAU Basketball Skills Series: Increasing Your Vertical Jump.  The dvd includes both plyometric drills and weight training exercises designed to improve the vertical leap of Florida Gator basketball players.

The first drill is the Anterior Leap and Throw.  The athlete begins in a squat position and will load the med ball to the hip closest to the wall. He will leap forward explosively covering as much ground as possible. He will land with the knees bent and the med ball loaded to the opposite hip. Immediately he will rotate and throw the med ball at the wall with maximum power. The athlete should complete 3 sets of 5 reps and then repeat going the opposite direction.

The second drill is the Lateral Leap and throw. In this exercise, the athlete begins with his shoulders perpendicular to the wall, but instead of leaping forward, he will leap laterally as far as possible. Once landing he will rotate and throw the ball with maximum power to the wall. Complete 3 sets of 5 reps and then repeat going the other direction.

The third exercise, the Anterior Lateral Leap Throw,  is a combination of the first two plyometric drills. the athlete will leap forward as far as possible and then leap laterally away from the wall. The drill ends with the athlete throwing the ball with as much power as possible to the wall. Complete 3 sets of 5 reps and repeat in the opposite direction.

The final exercise is the Full Squat Jump and Throw. Here the athlete will begin in a squat position with a med mall at his chest. The athlete will explode up and jump as high as possible while pushing the med ball into the air as high as possible. Complete 3 sets of 5 reps.

The Youtube video below has sound so please make sure your sound is turned on and that you have access to the site. Some schools block access to YouTube