Athletic Performance Toolbox

  • Strength Training
  • Speed and Agility
  • Administration
  • Injury Prevention/Rehabilitation
  • Professional Development
  • Archives

Setting Weightroom Goals

June 9, 2018 by

This article was provided by Training-Conditioning

How to use historical lifting averages to establish weightroom goals and guide players’ offseason programming.

By Allen Hedrick

Allen Hedrick, MA, CSCS*D, is Head Strength and Conditioning Coach at Colorado State University-Pueblo. He formerly held the same position at the NSCA’s national headquarters and the U.S. Air Force Academy. He can be reached at: allen.hedrick@yahoo.com

I often tell my athletes: You can get strong enough, but you can never get powerful enough. What I mean is that depending on their sport and position, athletes can reach a point where further strength gains won’t benefit performance. When that happens, it’s best to shift the training emphasis from increasing strength to increasing power.

At Colorado State University-Pueblo, we have developed a system that allows athletes to make this transition seamlessly. It’s centered on a set of historical lifting averages that we categorize by sport position, and we test athletes in these lifts every offseason. Those who test below the historical averages are placed in a strength-building group, while those who test above go into a power training group. When the strength-building athletes raise their scores sufficiently, they join the power group.

We’ve been using this model at CSU-Pueblo for years with several teams, including football. On the gridiron especially, we’ve experienced great results, including seven consecutive conference championships and a national title in 2014. These, and other similar outcomes, indicate that our system is having the desired effect of maximizing sport performance.

SUPPORTING THEORY

Although we’ve had great anecdotal success dividing our players’ workouts into strength- or power-based training, there is also evidence behind it. I’ve found support for this approach through years of research.

To start, as all performance coaches know, the need for strength varies by sport and position. For example, in football, interior linemen require higher strength levels than wide receivers.

The problem is that many traditional weightlifting programs focus too much on building these strength levels. As a result, athletes spend more time improving strength than developing power.

That may not seem like a bad thing in and of itself. However, as Vern Gambetta pointed out in his 1987 NSCA article “How Much Strength is Enough?” the primary objective of a strength and conditioning regimen should be to enhance an athlete’s ability to express strength for improved sport performance. And improved performance results more from increased power than increased strength.

So if power is the ultimate goal, why don’t we emphasize it from the start, instead of initially putting some of our athletes in a strength-building group? As explained in a 2011 Sports Medicine series of reviews, it’s because there’s a fundamental relationship between strength and power. Strength is a basic quality that influences maximum power production, so an athlete can’t have high power levels without first having a good strength base.

Then, once they reach a certain strength threshold, a shift in emphasis from strength to power is warranted and will be more effective at enhancing athletic performance. Therefore, the overall philosophy behind our historical average system is to get strong to get powerful and then get powerful to be more successful in competitions.

USING HISTORICAL AVERAGES

Two obvious questions then arise: How do you know when an athlete is strong enough? And what are the optimal strength levels necessary for high-level performance? We answer these questions by collecting the historical lifting averages of our players by position. I did this for seven years before I implemented the system, and I would recommend at least five years’ of data to others. Although I have used historical averages with multiple sports at CSU-Pueblo, I’ll focus on how we tailor them specifically for football in this section.

We test all of our football athletes twice a year—once in the spring and once in the summer. At both sessions, we measure their one-repetition maximums (1RM) in clean, squat, and bench.

Using our athletes’ final testing results from their senior years, we track what the average score is in each lift by position. Each year, the averages are updated to reflect the latest testing performances by our seniors. For example, our most recent averages for the squat were 550 pounds for a nose tackle, 352 pounds for a wide receiver, and 308 pounds for a quarterback.

When we test each football athlete at the beginning of the offseason, we compare their results to our historical averages. Those who test below the historical averages go into the “standard”—or strength—group. Most of our younger players fall into this category. Athletes who are at or above the historical averages are moved to the “advanced”—or power—group.

Although there is no “good” or “bad” group, we want the athletes to be pleased if they are testing at or above the averages. If they are testing below, we tell them not to be discouraged. This is simply an indication that they need to make further progress.

When athletes are placed in the standard group, they follow that program until the next testing time. Then, if they test at or above the averages in two out of the three lifts, they move to the advanced group.

DIFFERENT PLANS

The best way to understand how we manipulate our lifting regimens to either emphasize strength or power is to compare the football workouts for our standard group (below) and our advanced group (below). These two plans are for players in one of our “big skill” positions, which comprise offensive and defensive linemen, tight ends, and linebackers.

The first difference you may notice between the two programs is that there are more weightlifting movements for the advanced group. These athletes perform the more technical clean and power jerk right off the bat because they’ve already established the correct technique necessary to do the full movements. In contrast, the standard group performs two sets of a more basic lift first on Mondays and Fridays. This allows them to establish correct technique before moving on to more complex movements. So the standard athletes will do a push press on Fridays before advancing to power jerk.

Why the focus on the Olympic lifts for the advanced group? Because Olympic-style weightlifting can produce a much greater power output than traditional exercises, such as the squat or bench press. In addition, Olympic lifts significantly improve power output against a heavy load. And as explained in a 2011 Sports Medicine series of reviews, these movements are ideal for football athletes, who often have to generate high power against heavy loads.

A second difference between the two workouts is the advanced group’s use of contrast loads for barbell weightlifting movements. For example, on sets one, three, and five for the power jerk on Friday, the load is set at 65 percent of 1RM, while sets two, four, and six are performed at 80 percent. We do this because, according to the Sports Medicine article mentioned above, contrast loads target all areas of the force velocity curve to augment adaptations across a broad spectrum. The result is a superior increase in maximal power output. In contrast, the standard group uses a nearly constant training load for all sets.

A third variation between the two programs relates to their use of plyometrics. Both groups are exposed to plyometric training to develop maximal force as quickly as possible, but the standard group performs plyometrics as a stand-alone activity.

Meanwhile, the advanced group utilizes complex training, which pairs a weightlifting movement and a plyometric activity. Athletes then perform the two exercises consecutively with little to no rest between them. Completed first, the weightlifting movement trains the muscles’ ability to produce high levels of force. Then, the plyometric activity enhances the muscles’ ability to exert force through rapid eccentric-concentric transitional movements. As a result, this method trains the neurological and muscular systems at both ends of the force velocity curve at much higher levels than traditional modalities. The result is significant increases in peak power levels.

By using historical averages to assess our players’ strength and power levels every offseason, we can get a better idea of what areas they need to improve in. Then, by splitting them into standard and advanced lifting groups, we can ensure athletes follow the appropriate program to get strong, get powerful, and, ultimately, meet our goal of enhancing athletic performance.

Sidebar:

STANDARD GROUP

Below is a sample four-week offseason workout program for Colorado State University-Pueblo football players whose test scores have indicated they need to increase strength. All lifts are to be completed as explosively as possible, with controlled movement down. There should be a two-minute rest between all sets and exercises.

Note: “TB” stands for total body, which includes any of the weightlifting movements performed with a barbell or dumbbell. “CL” stands for core lift and comprises any exercise involving movement at more than one joint.

Week Sets and Reps

Week 1 TB=4×3, CL=4×4

Week 2 TB=4×5, CL=4×6

Week 3 TB=4×2, CL=4×2

Week 4 TB=4×3, CL=4×6

MONDAY WEDNESDAY FRIDAY

Speed Training Speed Training Total Body

Wall drills Lateral hop Push press, 2x TB

Form running Lateral hop and back Power jerk, 4x TB

Box jump, 3×4

Total Body Total Body Upper Body

Hang power clean, 2x TB Dumbbell power clean, TB Incline press, CL

Hang clean, 4x TB Med ball seated chest pass, 3×6

Drop jump, 3×4

Lower Body Upper Body Trunk

Dead lifts, CL Dumbbell front squats, CL Med ball twist throw, 3×8

Side lunge, CL Dumbbell straight-leg dead lift, CL

Dumbbell incline press, CL

Dumbbell row, CL

Trunk Trunk Neck

Two-hand bar twist, 3×12 Dumbbell press crunch, 3×20 Manual resistance flexion/extension, 2×8

Dumbbell back extensions,

3×10

Neck

Manual resistance flexion/extension, 2×8

Sidebar:

ADVANCED GROUP

Below is a sample four-week offseason workout program for Colorado State University-Pueblo football players who are aiming to increase power. All lifts are to be completed as explosively as possible, with controlled movement down. There should be a 90-second rest between total-body exercises and a two-minute rest between all others.

Note: “TB” and “CL” have the same meanings as in the standard group plan.

Week Set and Reps

Week 1 TB=6×3, CL=4×4

Week 2 TB=6×5, CL=4×6

Week 3 TB=6×3, CL=4×4

Week 4 TB=6×2, CL=4×3

MONDAY WEDNESDAY FRIDAY

Speed Training Speed Training Total Body

Wall drills Lateral hop Power jerk, TB

Form running Lateral hop and back Sets 1, 3, and 5 at 65 percent of 1RM

Sets 2, 4, and 6 at 80 percent of 1RM

Total Body Total Body Complex

Clean, TB Dumbbell clean, TB Depth jump, 3×4

Sets 1, 3, and 5 at 65 percent Med ball standing chest pass, 3×6
of one-repetition maximum
(1RM)
Sets 2, 4, and 6 at 80 percent

of 1RM

Complex Lower Body Upper Body

Keiser squat, 3×5 Dumbbell one-leg squat, CL Incline press, CL

Sled push, 3×10 yards Med ball back extension throws, 3×10

 

Lower Body Trunk Trunk

Dead lifts, CL Med ball overhead throw, 3×10 Med ball standing twist throw, 3×8

Side lunge, CL

Trunk Upper Body Neck

Two-hand bar twist, 3×12 Jammer, 2×6 Manual resistance flexion/extension, 2×8

Dumbbell back extensions, Dumbbell incline press, CL

3×10 Dumbbell row, CL

Neck

Manual resistance flexion/extension, 2×8

 

Filed Under: administration, strength training

Bell Power

May 19, 2018 by

This article was provided by Traning-Conditioning

Dumbbells and kettlebells provide unique advantages that can add value to any strength regimen, but only if you know how to fit them into a functional training approach.

By Vern Gambetta

Vern Gambetta, MA, is President of Gambetta Sports Training Systems in Sarasota, Fla., and a frequent contributor to Training & Conditioning. His daily thoughts on training athletes can be viewed on his blog: www.functionalpathtraining.blogspot.com.

Athletic trainers and strength coaches are constantly inundated with marketing claims about the next “latest and greatest” training aid or exercise method. Many of these pitches are laden with buzzwords, puffery, and half-truths about the training approaches being plugged and the science that supposedly backs them up.

Of course there have been some significant achievements in the training aid marketplace in recent decades, so I don’t want to paint all new products and systems with a broad brush. But despite the never-ending barrage of new ideas, the most basic and time-tested equipment is sometimes still the most practical. Such is the case with two of the oldest types of training implements: dumbbells and kettlebells.

Dumbbells have been around for so long that some early versions were literally “dumb (soundless) bells,” from which the clapper had been removed so someone could lift the heavy metal objects repeatedly without making a racket. And kettlebells were a staple of Eastern European training long before achieving their current revival of popularity in the West.

This article will give you some practical advice on getting the most out of dumbbell and kettlebell work. Using my experience with both modes of training for various sports and in the rehabilitation environment, I’ll discuss what these implements can and can’t do for athletes who use them, and cover ways to make dumbbell and kettlebell training as functional as possible.

MOVEMENTS, NOT MUSCLES
Regardless of the type of strength training, the goal of any sound program is to develop strength that an athlete can use in his or her sport. To accomplish this, I think of training as the process of moving through a spectrum of different movements and muscle actions with varied modes and loads to elicit maximum adaptation. Moving across the spectrum is a means to an end, and the end is a stronger, more functional athlete.

In my opinion, traditional approaches to strength training have been too heavily influenced by convenience. Many lifts and exercises focus on movement in a single plane with one joint because these movements are easy to describe to athletes, easy to relate to what we see in anatomy textbooks, and easy to evaluate through visual observation.

But performance in any sport is a multi-dimensional activity that takes place in a dynamic environment. Thus, truly functional performance involves moving the whole body in all three planes–sagittal, frontal, and transverse–using as many joints and muscles as needed to produce and reduce force. This is a key reason why the freedom of movement achieved with dumbbell and kettlebell training is so valuable.

Athletic movement involves synergists, stabilizers, neutralizers, and antagonists all working together. The central nervous system constantly modifies movement patterns in response to gravity, ground reaction forces, and momentum. Each activity is further refined and adjusted by feedback from the body’s proprioceptors.

Strength training, at its core, is actually coordination training with appropriate resistance, with the main goal of enhancing linkage and connectivity to produce more powerful and efficient movements required in an athlete’s sport. Dumbbells and kettlebells are excellent tools to train multi-dimensional movements and enhance power and coordination.

Because of their versatility, dumbbells and kettlebells can be used for resistance in all the essential movements needed for comprehensive athlete development:

• Pulling
• Pushing
• Squatting (and derivatives like lunges and step-ups)
• Rotation
• Bracing

In a well-designed program, all these movements should be incorporated through multi-plane, multi-joint movements that involve the full range of motion and high proprioceptive demand.

FITTING THEM IN
To design a functional training program and decide when and how best to incorporate dumbbells and kettlebells, it’s important to ask the following questions:

• What are the strength requirements of the sport?
• What muscle groups are used in the sport, and how can dumbbells and kettlebells be used to engage those muscle groups?
• What are the primary movement requirements and force reduction requirements?
• In what direction(s) are the greatest forces applied?
• What is the range of movement, and are dumbbells and kettlebells the best way to introduce resistance within that range?
• What are the most common injuries in the sport?

Dumbbells and kettlebells can both be viable modes of resistance in virtually any athlete’s training program, but they’re not a stand-alone training method. They must be part of a comprehensive program to achieve optimal results.

Kettlebells in particular have become something of a training fad lately, and despite their clear value, some claims regarding their benefits are a bit over the top. There are no “Russian secret” kettlebell training methods that single-handedly produced the huge, intimidating Soviet athletes of past generations, as some of the more ambitious marketing hype would lead you to believe.

In fact, kettlebells were a staple of U.S. and European gyms and physical education programs in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Just like climbing ropes, Indian clubs, and various other training implements, they fell out of favor as physical education moved away from movement gymnastics and toward team sports. There has been revived interest in kettlebells over the last 10 years, and today they can frequently be seen in commercial fitness centers and high school, college, and pro team weightrooms.

So how do you fit them into a comprehensive strength program? I think kettlebell training is best added as a later step in most progressions, after an athlete has built a solid foundation of strength and is starting to look for variability and different adaptive responses. Safety is a major reason behind this approach, since improper technique with a kettlebell can quickly put unwanted stress on the wrist and elbow. Mastering correct mechanics for the various movements performed with a kettlebell is essential to gaining optimum return and minimizing injury risk.

I am currently working with volleyball players, who rely heavily on swinging movements in their sport. For that reason, the swing-based mechanics of kettlebells are an excellent fit. On our total-body training days, I use the basic two-arm kettlebell swing for two sets of six, followed by one set of six one-arm swings with each arm and one set of six “swing and catch” movements with each arm. We then do jump shrugs with the kettlebell, and that leads into either high pulls with the kettlebell or kettlebell cleans (for the more advanced athletes). This is just one example of how kettlebells can be incorporated into a sport-specific program for highly trained athletes.

Dumbbells, meanwhile, are appropriate for practically all levels of athletes, even those just being introduced to strength training. The most common alternative to dumbbells is a bar, which can be limiting because its minimum weight is often more than a beginner can lift with proper technique. In addition, the athlete has to adapt and “fit” to the bar, fixing the hands in one position relative to the torso. Because the user is unable to turn his or her hands when using a bar, greater stress is placed on the elbow and shoulder, especially with inexperienced lifters.

A dumbbell, meanwhile, places virtually no restrictions on movement and positioning. For total-body movements like high pulls, cleans, and snatches, the maneuverability of dumbbells provides a major advantage. I have found that dumbbells are the best way to teach total-body pulling movements, such as the high pull, clean, and snatch, and once the athlete is proficient, we progress to bar work for added resistance and greater variety.

One of the most frequent questions athletes ask when working with dumbbells or kettlebells is how much weight they should lift. I use percent of body weight as a guideline to start, with the amount obviously depending on the movement and complexity of the exercise.

Whole-body movements demand a higher percentage of body weight than pressing movements, and the load should never be so great that the athlete cannot perform the prescribed sets and reps with the desired tempo and range of motion. Remember that rep speed–not just load–is critical for power development.

Also, it is important to have dumbbells available in 2.5-pound increments, or to use magnetic add-ons of 1.25 or 2.5 pounds to fine-tune the load. The standard five-pound increments commonly found on dumbbell racks are generally not sufficient to customize a progressive workout.

BENEFIT PACKAGE
If you want to make muscle power as functional as possible, nothing is more important than coordination and synergy between muscle groups and body parts. Dumbbells and kettlebells force this synergy while also requiring each limb to work independently, eliminating the potential for one side to compensate for the other at any point throughout the range of motion.

For deconditioned athletes and beginners, one of the most common factors limiting performance is a weak link somewhere in the kinetic chain. Once you’ve identified a weakness, dumbbells are versatile enough that you can customize a lift or movement to address the deficiency, and transition from lighter to heavier weight as the athlete makes progress.

Another advantage is that many beginners, especially female athletes strength training for the first time, find dumbbells much less intimidating than bars. I find that they quickly “dive in” with dumbbells, while with the bar they are hesitant to increase load or even to begin lifting.

When working with more advanced athletes engaged in high-level performance training, one of the best selling points for dumbbells and kettlebells is simple availability–they provide a weightroom without walls. With these implements’ easy portability, they can be used on a field, court, track, pool deck, or practically anywhere else athletes find themselves.

For all these reasons, dumbbells and kettlebells are valuable tools for athletes looking to build functional strength. And like with all pieces of equipment, the key is determining how best to use them based on an individual’s ability, experience, and performance goals. There’s good reason why some training tools have stood the test of time.

Sidebar: KETTLEBELL SAFETY
Every strength training method carries some degree of injury risk, especially if a proper progression is not followed and technique is not emphasized. The unique design of the kettlebell presents some challenges that must be overcome to minimize risk. Here are some points of advice on making kettlebell training as safe as possible:

• Even though kettlebell work is thought of primarily as a form of upper-body exercise, instruct athletes on proper leg stance to reduce the risk of poor body alignment during various movements.

• Teach the most basic swings and let the athlete get comfortable with those before moving on to more complex movements.

• Start with light kettlebells, and don’t progress to heavier ones until the athlete displays mastery of technique–and then, increase the load only in small increments.

• Don’t focus on the quantity of reps at the expense of quality of movement. A large number of reps with less-than-optimal technique provides fewer advantages and poses a much greater injury risk than a smaller number with excellent technique.

Sidebar: WHICH TO USE?
This article discusses dumbbells and kettlebells more or less interchangeably at times, because from a training perspective, they provide many of the same benefits relative to other types of strength work. But each is a unique resistance tool, and while the dumbbell can be used for practically any single-arm lift, the kettlebell has more specialized applications.

The shape of the kettlebell and the placement of its handle provide a weight distribution that significantly increases the difficulty of lifting it. That’s one reason why I recommend kettlebell work only for intermediate and advanced lifters. Mastery of swing mechanics and variations of the swing are essential for safe and effective kettlebell training. I use the swing and its permutations as a lead-in to pulling movements, and I find that swinging with a kettlebell is very helpful for developing the muscle memory and timing of multi-joint movements necessary for proficient pulling.

I don’t typically make the kettlebell my only resistance training tool for an athlete. Instead, I blend it with other methods in the same workout. This is partly for practical reasons and partly strategic. Practically, I just do have not a wide enough range of kettlebell weights to accommodate the diverse needs of the athletes I’m working with. Strategically, I think kettlebells are perfect for certain movement patterns (like the aforementioned swinging) and great for adding variety to a workout, but by themselves they do not offer the range of possibilities necessary for comprehensive strength training.

Filed Under: strength training

Sliding Boards for Muscle Strength and Stability

May 12, 2018 by

This article was provided by Training-Conditioning

For coaches trying to find a new way to help their athletes build strength and muscle stability, look no further than the slide board.

Typically six to eight feet long and two feet wide, these boards always have a slippery surface and many times have a bumper at each end. To utilize them, athletes wear special booties that allow their feet to slide freely.

According to Anthony Yeung, CSCS, in an article for Muscle & Fitness, the lack of friction from the slick surface causes the user to become unbalanced. When this happens, the entire body is forced to participate in the movement, engaging stabilizer muscles. “That spikes the intensity on each move, ultimately building more muscle,” says Yeung.

“It also unlocks unique exercise variations,” he continues. “On a sliding surface, you can move in new directions, change angles within an exercise, and even reduce the impact on your joints.”

While this exercise might seem more applicable to sports such as ice hockey, it can actually be valuable for any athlete. “Moving side to side is necessary to change direction effectively,” writes Strength and Conditioning Coach Bobby Dattero in an article for Evolution Sports Performance. “Sports like basketball, football, baseball, and hockey all rely on this side to side movement at different parts in the game.”

In the most standard way to use the slideboard, athletes start at one end, hinge the hips, stay low to the ground and forcefully push off of one leg towards the opposite side of the board. When they reach the other side, athletes do the same in the opposite direction, mimicking the motion of ice-skating without actually moving forward. To maximize the benefits of this exercise, athletes must give 100 percent effort in their pushes, rather than sliding across at a leisurely pace.

Along with strengthening athletes’ ability to change direction, this movement can be used to both build power and endurance. If working on power, Dattero suggests focusing on a low amount of strong pushes. On the other hand, if you are using this exercise for conditioning, he suggests adding reps, while still putting all of your strength in each push.

Beyond the primary sliding exercise, the amount of training workouts that can be done on the slide board are endless. Because of the activation of stabilizing muscles, it can be used with almost any exercise to add variety and increase difficulty. It strengthens balance and coordination and builds muscles that don’t get as much work from the typical exercises on grass or a weightroom floor.

Rich Sadiv, Head Strength Coach at The Parisi Speed School in New Jersey, has applied the slide board to many different exercises. In an article for Stack.com, he describes seven different exercises and the benefits that accompany them. Here are three of those examples:

Single-Leg Mountain Climbers

1. Begin in a push-up position with your hands off the end of the board and feet placed on the board.

2. Bring one leg forward until your knee just passes the edge of the board.

3. Alternate legs as fast as possible, keeping the core tight and not allowing your knees to slip outside your elbows.

Sadiv suggests starting with timed sets of 15 seconds and working up to three sets of 30 seconds with 60 second rest periods between each one. Because of the lack of stability, this exercise works the lower body, core, and shoulders, and is also a great addition to any conditioning workout. Fitness professional Naomi Talbot provides a look at the Single-Leg Mountain Climber in action on this video.

Reverse Lunge

1. Begin at one end of the board facing away. Place your left foot off the board and right foot on it.

2. Although variations exits, Sadiv suggests bringing your left hand up and your right hand back as you slide your right foot across the board in a lunging motion.

3. Move back to starting position.

Sadiv suggests doing five repetitions before changing to the left leg. You can then move up in reps and add resistance by holding dumbbells. This exercise helps to build strength in the glute and quad muscles, while also building power by teaching your body to push forcefully off the ground. For a variation of this move with dumbbells, check out this video from Vanhook Sports Performance.

Double-Leg Pike

1. Start in a push up position with your hands off of the slide board and your feet together on the board.

2. Keeping your legs straight and knees locked, raise your hips toward the ceiling. Try to get your feet as close as flat to possible.

3. Reverse the movement into starting position.

For this move, start with sets of five. When you can do this without error, move to sets of 10. The double-leg pike is great for athletes looking to increase their core strength. For an example of this exercise, watch this video from Deep Relief Peak Performance Athletic Training Center).

Filed Under: strength training

Upper Body Warm-up Exercises

May 5, 2018 by

Activate your core, stabilize your shoulders, and get your chest firing with these 3 quick drills.

In the video clip below Michael Cano, of ONEighty Athletics demonstrates three upper body warm-up exercises. The video provides a demonstration of each exercise and as well as key coaching points.

ONEighty Athletics is a great source of training ideas. Here is a Free resource the are currently offering: Ultimate Speed Training Blueprint.

The YouTube video below has audio, so please make sure that your volume is turned up. Click the arrow to play.

Filed Under: strength training

Hip Exercises

April 16, 2018 by

This post provided by Training-Conditioning

The hips play a major role in a variety of athletic movements, from running and jumping to rotating and changing direction. Therefore, it’s important to incorporate some hip strengthening exercises into your training program.

John Papp of STACK.com outlines six movements that will help athletes build and maintain the strong, flexible hips they need to perform.

Monster Walks:

Place a mini band or hip circle around both legs above the knees. Start by bending the knees and hips slightly while keeping the toes straight ahead and feet together. Then move the right foot forward and to the right with the left foot following. After you bring both feet back together, step the left foot forward and to the left, with the right foot following. Repeat for 10 to 12 steps to each side and then reverse the exercise by stepping backwards.

Lateral Band Walks:

This exercise also requires a mini band or hip circle, but this time you can place it around the toes, ankles, or the thighs just above the knees. Your decision should be based on the strength of the band you are using. Once again, start with your feet together, toes straight ahead, and hips and knees slightly bent. Make sure to keep your toes pointed straight ahead as you step to the right with your right foot and follow it with your left. Then step to left with your left, and so on. Aim for 10 to 12 steps to each side.

Squash the Bug:

Like the Monster Walk, start by putting a mini band around both legs above the knees. Then spread your feet apart until there is tension on the band. Position yourself by moving your right foot slightly back so that your right toes are in line with the middle of your left foot. While keeping the left foot planted to the ground, life your right heal and rotate your right leg as if you were squashing a bug underneath your toes. Keep expanding your range without moving your left leg, hips, or upper body. Once you have reached your maximum range, return to the starting position and repeat with the other foot. A set of 10 to 12 on each side should be sufficient.

Band/Belt Squat Marches:

This exercise is great with a belt squat machine, but if one is not available you will have to use bands and a dip belt. Take a handful of heavy bands over to a squat rack and set the j-hooks as low as possible before hooking the bands across the j-hooks. Then put on the dip belt, loop the chain under the bands, and stand up. You should feel the tension as the bands try to pull you down. With your chest up tall, start to march by lifting each foot slowly off the ground. Do this for one to three minutes.

Sumo Deadlift:

Start by setting up close to the bar with a wide stance. Your feet should be much wider than your hips and your toes should be turned slightly out. The width of your stance and the angle of your toes will depend on your body structure, so don’t hesitate to make adjustments. Once your stance is set, drop down to the bar, grab it with a grip inside of your thighs, and bring your chest up tall. While keeping your lats and abs tight, ease the bar off the floor and then explode up as fast as possible. During this motion, you should drive your hips forward and keep your chest up. At the top, don’t overarch your lower back.

Box Squats:

Set up in a slightly wider stance than normal with toes angled out in order to really target the hips. Hold up a barbell on your back and sit on the box beneath you. While sitting back, be sure to push your knees out. After reaching the box, sit briefly and then explode up from it as quickly as possible.

Filed Under: strength training

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • …
  • 15
  • Next Page »
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • linkedin

© Copyright 2025 Athletic Performance Toolbox

Design by BuzzworthyBasketballMarketing.com

Privacy Policy